Compare · Prices checked October 21, 2026
Cursor vs Claude Code (2026)
Published starting prices: Cursor, Free; Plus $8/mo. Claude Code, from $20/mo. Side-by-side public pricing, what each does, real use cases and who each suits, all from our listings with sources. We haven't tested either hands-on.
-
CodingFree tier
Cursor
An AI code editor with agents that plan and make multi-file changes, plus cloud agents and code review.
Subscription · 2 use casesFree; Plus $8/mo
-
Coding
Claude Code
Anthropic's coding agent for the terminal, editor and web. It reads your codebase, makes changes and runs commands.
Subscription · 4 use casesfrom $20/mo
Quick answer
- Cheaper: Comparing the lowest listed monthly plans: Cursor Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only), and Claude Code Pro: $20/mo ($17 billed annually; Claude Code included). Cursor lists the lower one. Cursor also has a free plan. Plans differ in what they include, and some are per seat or billed yearly, so compare the plan details. Checked October 21, 2026.
- Free plans: Cursor: yes. Its Free plan is $0 (limited AI use), checked October 21, 2026. Claude Code: no $0 plan on its pricing page (checked October 21, 2026).
Pricing side by side
| Item |  Cursor |  Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Plus $8/mo | from $20/mo |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Plans |
|
|
| Pricing note | Cursor's plans are now bundled with X/Grok features. Third-party models (Claude, GPT and others) are billed separately by usage. | Also available pay-as-you-go through the Anthropic API. |
| Checked | October 21, 2026 | October 21, 2026 |
| Source | Vendor pricing page | Vendor pricing page |
Copied from each vendor's public pricing page on the date shown. "not published" means the vendor doesn't publish it; we don't guess. Prices change; confirm with the vendor.
Features and details from our listings
| Item | Cursor | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI code editor with agents that plan and make multi-file changes, plus cloud agents and code review. | Anthropic's coding agent for the terminal, editor and web. It reads your codebase, makes changes and runs commands. |
| Made by | Cursor | Anthropic |
| Listed under | Coding agents | Coding agents |
| Jobs it fits |
|
|
| Verified public use cases | 2 | 4 |
Use cases
Cursor
-
Use caseCoding
A beginner poker player went from small Python scripts that export his hand histories to a full Laravel web app for reviewing hands, built with help from Cursor.
Oct 2025Reilly Chase
-
Use caseCoding
A developer wrote a Cursor rule whose job is to write other Cursor rules, so project conventions get saved as reusable instructions for the agent.
Apr 2025Adithyan (blog), via Hacker News
Claude Code
-
Use caseCoding
A developer explains his routine of having Claude Code write a plan first, reviewing it, and only then letting it implement, keeping planning and execution separate.
-
Use caseCoding
A data-recovery hobbyist used Claude Code to update the 25-year-old Linux ftape driver so his 1990s QIC-80 tape drive can work with a modern kernel instead of an ancient CentOS install.
Sep 2025Dmitry Brant
-
Use caseCoding
A staff engineer at Sanity describes expecting Claude Code's first attempt to be mostly wrong, and how iterating with context turned it into an everyday tool.
Sep 2025Sanity blog
-
Use caseCoding
Semgrep's security researchers had Claude Code and OpenAI Codex hunt for vulnerabilities in real Python web apps: both found real bugs (about 20 high-severity), but more than 80% of what they flagged were false positives.
Sep 2025Semgrep blog
Use cases are summarised in our own words from the linked public post; vendor case studies are labelled. All use cases.
Who each is best for
- SubscriptionFree plan
Cursor is best for
- Teams that need to: Build or change an app with an agent in the editor; Refactor and fix bugs across files.
- Budget: starts at Free; Plus $8/mo (subscription, free plan available).
- Subscription
Claude Code is best for
- Teams that need to: Make larger changes in an existing codebase; Update old code to run on modern systems; Security and code review passes.
- Budget: starts at from $20/mo (subscription).
- Watch out: In April 2026 a heavily upvoted GitHub issue said Claude Code had become unusable for complex engineering tasks after updates; quality can shift between releases. Source
From our listing data (jobs, public pricing); not a hands-on test. Full details: Cursor · Claude Code.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Cursor or Claude Code?
Comparing the lowest listed monthly plans: Cursor Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only), and Claude Code Pro: $20/mo ($17 billed annually; Claude Code included). Cursor lists the lower one. Cursor also has a free plan. Plans differ in what they include, and some are per seat or billed yearly, so compare the plan details. Checked October 21, 2026.
Is Cursor free? Is Claude Code free?
Cursor: yes. Its Free plan is $0 (limited AI use), checked October 21, 2026. Claude Code: no $0 plan on its pricing page (checked October 21, 2026).
How much does Cursor cost?
Cursor lists Free: $0 (limited AI use); Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only); Premium: $30/mo (latest models, cloud agents); Super: $100/mo (15x Plus usage); Ultra: $200/mo (50x Plus usage); Teams: from $30/user/mo. Its lowest listed monthly plan is Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only). Cursor's plans are now bundled with X/Grok features. Third-party models (Claude, GPT and others) are billed separately by usage. Checked October 21, 2026 on the vendor's pricing page.
How much does Claude Code cost?
Claude Code lists Pro: $20/mo ($17 billed annually; Claude Code included); Max 5x: $100/mo; Max 20x: $200/mo. Its lowest listed monthly plan is Pro: $20/mo ($17 billed annually; Claude Code included). Also available pay-as-you-go through the Anthropic API. Checked October 21, 2026 on the vendor's pricing page.
Did AITeamGuide test them?
Not hands-on. This comparison is built from each vendor's public pricing page (with the date we checked it), published product information and credited public use cases.
Can a vendor pay to win this comparison?
No. Nothing here is paid. Paid placements on AITeamGuide are always labelled "Sponsored" or "Featured" and never change a comparison or ranking.
Related guides
All comparisons →- Best AI coding agents 202614 compared by price
- Cheapest AI coding assistants14 sorted by price
- Cursor vs GitHub CopilotSide-by-side pricing
- Claude Code vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Kiro vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Devin vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Devin vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Factory AI vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Factory AI vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Cursor alternatives13 compared by price
- Claude Code alternatives13 compared by price
More comparisons
- Lovable vs Bolt.newSide-by-side pricing
- Bolt.new vs v0Side-by-side pricing
- Devin vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs GitHub CopilotSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Factory AI vs DevinSide-by-side pricing
Work at Cursor or Claude Code? Vendors can claim their listing for free or feature it with a label that says "Sponsored"; paid status never changes the order on this page. Building a different agent? List it here.
Comparing Cursor and Claude Code? Get the weekly AITeamGuide
One email a week: the best new AI agents, real prices and price changes (Cursor and Claude Code included), real-world use cases and new Hub tools. Free; unsubscribe anytime.