Compare · Prices checked October 28, 2026
OpenAI Codex vs Cursor (2026)
Published starting prices: OpenAI Codex, Free; Plus $20/mo. Cursor, Free; Plus $8/mo. Side-by-side public pricing, what each does, real use cases and who each suits, all from our listings with sources. We haven't tested either hands-on.
-
CodingFree tier
OpenAI Codex
OpenAI's coding agent, in a desktop app, CLI, IDE extension and on the web; included with ChatGPT plans.
Subscription · 5 use casesFree; Plus $20/mo
-
CodingFree tier
Cursor
An AI code editor with agents that plan and make multi-file changes, plus cloud agents and code review.
Subscription · 2 use casesFree; Plus $8/mo
Short answer: OpenAI Codex vs Cursor pricing
Comparing the lowest listed monthly plans: OpenAI Codex Go: $8/mo (lightweight tasks), and Cursor Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only; or $80/yr billed annually). They list the same lowest monthly price. OpenAI Codex and Cursor also have a free plan. Plans differ in what they include, and some are per seat or billed yearly, so compare the plan details. Checked October 28, 2026. OpenAI Codex: yes. Its Free plan is $0 (quick tasks), checked October 28, 2026. Cursor: yes. Its Free plan is $0 (limited AI use), checked October 28, 2026.
Pricing side by side
| Item | ||
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Plus $20/mo | Free; Plus $8/mo |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Plans |
|
|
| Pricing note | Or use your own API key and pay API prices. | Cursor's plans are now bundled with X/Grok features. Third-party models (Claude, GPT and others) are billed separately by usage. Annual billing: Plus $80/yr, Premium $300/yr, Super $1,000/yr, Ultra $2,000/yr (cursor.com/docs/models-and-pricing, checked October 28, 2026). |
| Checked | October 28, 2026 | October 28, 2026 |
| Source | Vendor pricing page | Vendor pricing page |
Copied from each vendor's public pricing page on the date shown. "not published" means the vendor doesn't publish it; we don't guess. Prices change; confirm with the vendor.
Features and details from our listings
| Item | OpenAI Codex | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | OpenAI's coding agent, in a desktop app, CLI, IDE extension and on the web; included with ChatGPT plans. | An AI code editor with agents that plan and make multi-file changes, plus cloud agents and code review. |
| Made by | OpenAI | Cursor |
| Listed under | Coding agents | Coding agents |
| Jobs it fits |
|
|
| Verified public use cases | 5 | 2 |
Use cases
OpenAI Codex
-
Use caseCoding
A solo developer spent three months making the Steam game Solitaire: Kingdom in Chains with Claude Code and Codex alongside Photoshop, Cubase and Filmora, and puts the AI share of the work at about 30%.
Oct 2026@bigbropatchwork on X
-
Use caseCoding
After running Claude Code and Codex side by side on two real projects for weeks, a builder logged one day in which Claude Code delivered 9 changes he could open and use, while Codex stopped three times over rules it had written for itself and got about 18 minutes of building done.
Oct 2026@bstuartTI on X
-
Use caseCoding
A developer ran Google's open Gemma 4 model locally inside Codex CLI and wrote up how a coding agent performs without a cloud model.
-
Use caseCoding
Simon Willison used Codex CLI to port the JustHTML HTML5 parser from Python to JavaScript in about 4.5 hours, using the existing html5lib test suite to check the agent's work.
Dec 2025Simon Willison's Weblog
-
Use caseCoding
Semgrep's security researchers had Claude Code and OpenAI Codex hunt for vulnerabilities in real Python web apps: both found real bugs (about 20 high-severity), but more than 80% of what they flagged were false positives.
Sep 2025Semgrep blog
Cursor
-
Use caseCoding
A beginner poker player went from small Python scripts that export his hand histories to a full Laravel web app for reviewing hands, built with help from Cursor.
Oct 2025Reilly Chase
-
Use caseCoding
A developer wrote a Cursor rule whose job is to write other Cursor rules, so project conventions get saved as reusable instructions for the agent.
Apr 2025Adithyan (blog), via Hacker News
Use cases are summarised in our own words from the linked public post; vendor case studies are labelled. All use cases.
Who each is best for
- SubscriptionFree plan
OpenAI Codex is best for
- Teams that need to: Port or rewrite code against a test suite; Delegate coding tasks to run in the cloud.
- Budget: starts at Free; Plus $20/mo (subscription, free plan available).
- SubscriptionFree plan
Cursor is best for
- Teams that need to: Build or change an app with an agent in the editor; Refactor and fix bugs across files.
- Budget: starts at Free; Plus $8/mo (subscription, free plan available).
From our listing data (jobs, public pricing); not a hands-on test. Full details: OpenAI Codex · Cursor.
FAQ
Which is cheaper, OpenAI Codex or Cursor?
Comparing the lowest listed monthly plans: OpenAI Codex Go: $8/mo (lightweight tasks), and Cursor Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only; or $80/yr billed annually). They list the same lowest monthly price. OpenAI Codex and Cursor also have a free plan. Plans differ in what they include, and some are per seat or billed yearly, so compare the plan details. Checked October 28, 2026.
Is OpenAI Codex free? Is Cursor free?
OpenAI Codex: yes. Its Free plan is $0 (quick tasks), checked October 28, 2026. Cursor: yes. Its Free plan is $0 (limited AI use), checked October 28, 2026.
How much does OpenAI Codex cost?
OpenAI Codex lists Free: $0 (quick tasks); Go: $8/mo (lightweight tasks); Plus: $20/mo (Codex on web, CLI, IDE); Pro: from $100/mo (plans at $100, $200 or $500/mo); Business: $25/user/mo ($20 billed annually). Its lowest listed monthly plan is Go: $8/mo (lightweight tasks). Or use your own API key and pay API prices. Checked October 28, 2026 on the vendor's pricing page.
How much does Cursor cost?
Cursor lists Free: $0 (limited AI use); Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only; or $80/yr billed annually); Premium: $30/mo (latest models, cloud agents; or $300/yr billed annually); Super: $100/mo (15x Plus usage; or $1,000/yr billed annually); Ultra: $200/mo (50x Plus usage; or $2,000/yr billed annually); Teams: from $30/user/mo. Its lowest listed monthly plan is Plus: $8/mo (Grok models only; or $80/yr billed annually). Cursor's plans are now bundled with X/Grok features. Third-party models (Claude, GPT and others) are billed separately by usage. Annual billing: Plus $80/yr, Premium $300/yr, Super $1,000/yr, Ultra $2,000/yr (cursor.com/docs/models-and-pricing, checked October 28, 2026). Checked October 28, 2026 on the vendor's pricing page.
Did AITeamGuide test them?
Not hands-on. This comparison is built from each vendor's public pricing page (with the date we checked it), published product information and credited public use cases.
Can a vendor pay to win this comparison?
No. Nothing here is paid. Paid placements on AITeamGuide are always labelled "Sponsored" or "Featured" and never change a comparison or ranking.
Related guides
All comparisons →- Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Best AI coding agents 202616 compared by price
- Cheapest AI coding assistants16 sorted by price
- Cursor vs GitHub CopilotSide-by-side pricing
- Claude Code vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Cursor vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Kiro vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Devin vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Devin vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Factory AI vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Lovable vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Replit vs CursorSide-by-side pricing
- Replit vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- GitHub Copilot vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Kiro vs OpenAI CodexSide-by-side pricing
- Cursor alternatives15 compared by price
More comparisons
- Lovable vs Bolt.newSide-by-side pricing
- Bolt.new vs v0Side-by-side pricing
- Devin vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Augment Code vs GitHub CopilotSide-by-side pricing
- Factory AI vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Factory AI vs DevinSide-by-side pricing
- Lovable vs Base44Side-by-side pricing
- Replit vs Base44Side-by-side pricing
- Lovable vs EmergentSide-by-side pricing
- Lovable vs ReplitSide-by-side pricing
- v0 vs LovableSide-by-side pricing
- Lovable vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Replit vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- GitHub Copilot vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Devin vs GitHub CopilotSide-by-side pricing
- Kiro vs Claude CodeSide-by-side pricing
- Replit vs EmergentSide-by-side pricing
Work at OpenAI Codex or Cursor? Vendors can claim their listing for free or feature it with a label that says "Sponsored"; paid status never changes the order on this page. Building a different agent? List it here.
Popular pricing guides
- AI sales agents: types and prices
- Best AI sales agents
- Cheapest AI sales tools
- Clay vs Apollo
- Amplemarket vs Apollo
- 11x alternatives
- Best AI receptionists
- What an AI receptionist really costs
- Cheapest AI receptionists
- Retell vs Vapi
- Smith.ai vs Ruby
- Best AI coding agents
- Cursor vs Claude Code
- Claude Code vs Codex
- Cheapest AI coding assistants
- Cheapest AI app builders
- Lovable vs Base44
- Free AI coding agents
- Best AI customer support agents
- Intercom Fin vs Zendesk
- Cheapest AI email assistants
- Best AI email assistants
- Best AI meeting note takers
- Otter vs Fireflies
- Free AI note takers
- Free AI agents
- AI agent pricing statistics
Get price changes for OpenAI Codex and Cursor in one weekly email
We re-check vendor pricing pages and note what changed. One email a week: price changes and new free plans (OpenAI Codex and Cursor included), the best new AI agents, real-world use cases and new Hub tools. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
Free, no signup needed: the AI agent pricing cheat sheet, the cheapest listed plan for every job on one printable page.
AI coding assistant pricing per developer and for a team of 5 or 10: free plans, cheapest paid plans and team bills, with check dates.